157: In respect of just one C, Mr Kuschel, there was clearly a claim in negligence for psychiatric damage (aggravation of pre-existing despair). 162: The Judge accepted anxiety brought on by financial obligation had been a cause that is significant of proceeded despair. At test, C abandoned their FSMA claim for injury and pursued it in negligence just 163.
166: in the face from it, this will be a claim for pure injury that is psychiatric the damage comes from decisions to provide C cash; there is absolutely no determined situation where in fact the Court has discovered that a responsibility of care exists in this type of situation or such a thing analogous. Continue reading